ARM: We are more mature than X86

The mobile device market is fiercely competitive. Currently, the mainstream computing cores are mostly adopting Cortex series chips introduced by ARM, including Qualcomm, NVIDIA, TI, and MediaTek. But in addition, Intel, the leading X86 architecture vendor that has dominated the desktop PC market for many years, has also actively moved into the field of operational computing in recent years. After several years of hard work, it has also reached a certain degree of scale. In response to the current status of the mobile market, James Bruce, chief mobile device strategist at Amway International, a chip company, interviewed at the Computex 2013 Taipei International Computer Show, pointed out that products using the ARM architecture are superior in terms of power consumption performance and product diversity. For the opponent's X86 architecture. In addition, because more than 60% of applications are written and optimized based on the ARM architecture, software compatibility is also better than X86 products. On the whole, Security believes that only ARM's products can meet consumer needs, vendor innovation, and differentiation from other brands.

James Bruce, chief security mobile device strategist at Antioch International, believes that the long-running eco system of ARM has a relatively complete product line available, including the Cortex-15 for high-end products of more than US$600, and the target 200. The mid-priced Cortex-A12 to 350 US dollars. For consumers, the products that can be chosen are more abundant, and it is easier for manufacturers to introduce differentiated products for different markets. In addition, the telecommunications subsidies that are usually available for products in this price range are more flexible, so the CP value is relatively high and it is easy. To hit the sweet spot of consumers, the market is expected to increase in recent years. Therefore, as a whole, chips using ARM not only outperform their rivals in terms of selectivity, price, and power saving, but also because ARM's products can also be used in many areas such as home appliances and robots. In contrast, the X86 market uses the Intel Core series as an example. Basically just continuing the computer's thinking mode, focusing only on product performance, Intel's entry into the mobile market has not been truly representative and influential products for about two years. So overall ARM is more fun than the opponent.

For Intel and other vendors claiming that their dual-core processors can use dynamic clock adjustments to achieve power savings, James Bruce, chief operating unit strategist at Andromeda International, points out that even if a large core reduces clock operation, his standby power The demand will still not be better than switching directly to the Cortex-A7 small core, as it emphasizes the relationship between fuel-efficient cars and hybrid vehicles. In addition, processors under the X86 architecture, regardless of the instruction set or circuit design, are much more complex than the ARM chip, which also helps the processor to improve its power consumption performance. James Bruce even directly stated that Inetel was able to introduce a dynamically adjusted power-saving method based on the psychology of competition because it saw the power-saving design of ARM with a small and large core architecture.